Stuart Phillips

Great read!

No fixed number will answer the question, but this paper provides some nice guidelines for long(er) distance athletes: [link] and this one for 'periodized' nutrition

Drugs, clocks and exercise in ageing: hype and hope, fact and fiction [link] This is a flat-out great read from @c_handschin and the @HandschinLab

Great article!

Daniel, great read. Congrats on the publication. How do you propose we separate the production of lactate (or any other metabolite) from muscle contraction and thus assign a truly causal role to it as opposed to a corollary metabolite that goes up with intense exercise? 1/2

But it happens about 1x10^15 times/d on Twitter and other SM platforms. The proliferation of online expertise and the death of expertise (good book by Tom Nichol if you're interested). Thanks for such insightful discourse... minutes of time lost! 4/4

For everyone complaining about OA fees in scientific publishing… this is worth a read

Researchers’ perspectives on adverse event reporting in resistance training trials: a qualitative study Interesting work from @l_giangregorio's lab led by Rasha El-Kotob (twitter?)

Dose-response association of aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity with mortality .'Only' observational, but strong evidence showing that @CSEPdotCA and US PA guidelines are spot-on to recommend AE AND RT as being > AE

Great thread from @nick_krontiris on this paper showing a dose-response from PA that includes RT as well AE Spoiler: RT+AE > AE alone 😉

A very nice meta-analysis here from @ExerciseBiology [link] I'd advocate for one session/wk with a velocity component?

Applauding the main conclusion: we need more work in women and trying to understand women’s physiology in relation to their MC. The headline on injury risk is not supported by science